
I used to work at a company. I had a coworker named A (an older “auntie” type). We were very close and always helped each other out—mostly small things. During that time, the company had problems, so A encouraged me to resign and promised she would take me to a new place with better pay. It was supposed to be a shop that A and B would open together.
But right now, they have me working at the office of B’s friend, and B is also a partner, but the salary is not as high as before. A told me, “Just do it for now. When the new shop opens, you can become a full-time employee. For now we need to help each other get through this period.”
Later, they opened a new company like we had discussed. A and B invested as shareholders, while I was simply waiting for them to call me to work at their shop. While I was working at this office, they had me do many things—shop signs, menus, making a page, design work, promotions, and so on. A said,
“That way we don’t have to hire someone else, because just hiring for a sign and menu already costs a lot. Better to use you—I'll treat you to a meal as compensation.”
I use paid software that requires topping up every month (I use it for studying too), and I also secretly used office work time to help A. At first, I did the work for free and didn’t think much of it. But then A started becoming picky—if she didn’t like something, she would scold me. Sometimes after I finished a menu, she would change her mind and say she didn’t want that menu anymore and that I should make a new one. She kept making me revise it again and again.
After A got the shop sign and menu from me, she never came to see me at the office again. She only called to use me for tasks, like:
“Please issue an invoice. I’ll email it to him.” Or: “Please make an Excel file and send it. I’ll use it as various templates in the shop.”
Now it has been more than two months that I’ve been doing things for them continuously—without them hiring me as an employee, and without even any “kindness compensation.” They never treated me to the meal they promised. And I still have to dodge the big boss at the office so I can do work for A and B.
Regarding the agreement I mentioned earlier: when their company opened, they didn’t follow through on the promise. I asked B, “Since it’s open now, when will I get to work there?” He replied, “No need to come. The two of us will do it ourselves.”
I felt a bit upset, but I thought maybe that’s good too—A probably won’t call me to use me anymore, because for basic documents and Excel forms—bills, menu forms, accounting forms—I already made everything for them. They can use it all year, forever. Then I can finally focus fully on my current job.
But…only a few days later, she called me again and asked me to be the admin managing their new shop’s page. I asked, “How much will you pay me?” She laughed and only said, “Try doing it and see if you can.”
What should I do in this situation? If I ask for money, I never get it; even “kindness compensation” has never happened. If I cut them off, I will probably get fired from this office because B is a partner. And it’s hard to find a job these days. But if I keep being used like this, I’m truly exhausted.
She said "let's help each other through this period." You made the signs, the menus, the Excel templates, the invoices, the social media page. She changed her mind on the menu three times, scolded you when she didn't like something, and then — when the shop finally opened and you asked about the job she promised — she said "no need to come, the two of us will do it ourselves." Then called you four days later to ask you to manage their page for free. And laughed when you asked about pay. I want you to really sit with that laugh for a moment. 😶
I'll be honest: what you've described is not a friendship that got a little complicated. It's a systematic free-labor arrangement that was built, step by step, using your kindness, your fear of losing your job, and your hope that people who call themselves close to you will eventually do right by you. They won't. The evidence is two months long and includes a meal that was promised and never delivered. Let's talk about it. 🔍
Let me reconstruct the timeline without the friendship framing, because the friendship framing is exactly what made this work on you.
A encouraged you to resign from a stable job. She did this by promising you a better-paying position at a new shop she and B would open. You resigned. The new shop did not immediately materialize. In the interim, you were placed at B's friend's office at a lower salary than your previous job — so you're already down financially from the moment this arrangement began. A's response to this was: "Just do it for now. When the new shop opens, you can become a full-time employee. For now we need to help each other get through this period." 📉
Then the work began. Signs. Menus. Social media page. Design work. Promotions. Invoices. Excel templates for billing, menus, and accounting — templates they will use, per your own assessment, forever. You did all of this using paid software you top up monthly with your own money, during time you were supposed to be working for the office that is actually paying you a salary, hiding from your boss while doing it. The compensation offered for this body of work was a meal. The meal never happened. 🍽️
When the shop finally opened and you asked B about the promised position, he said: "No need to come. The two of us will do it ourselves." Four days later, A called to ask you to manage their page. When you asked how much she'd pay you, she laughed and said: "Try doing it and see if you can."
I want to name what that laugh was. It wasn't nervousness. It wasn't awkwardness. That laugh was the laugh of someone who has correctly identified that you will keep working for free and knows it. It was not a question about your capability. It was a test of whether you've figured out the game yet. You hadn't — at the time. But you're here now, so let's fix that. 🎯
The reason this feels impossible to solve is that you're looking at it as one tangled mess. It's actually three separate problems, and untangling them tells you exactly which tools to use on which part.
Most people try to solve Thread 1 emotionally, Thread 2 passively (by hoping), and Thread 3 by ignoring it. The result is exactly what you're experiencing: exhaustion with no resolution. We're going to handle all three. 🛠️
You're not a bad person for getting here. You're someone with a functional human instinct toward loyalty and reciprocity who encountered people who don't share that instinct and recognized it as an opportunity. But there are patterns on your side that allowed this to keep running, and you need to see them clearly so you can stop them. 🪞
You gave first and set terms never. The moment you did the first piece of work — the first menu, the first design — for free with no defined scope, you established the baseline. Free, unlimited, revision-upon-revision. Baselines are extremely hard to renegotiate upward. Every time you accepted a new task without naming a price, you confirmed the baseline. This isn't a moral failing. It's a negotiation error, and it's fixable going forward — but only if you stop confirming the baseline immediately. 📋
You used office time to do their work. I understand why — you were trying to help, you were hiding it, you thought it was temporary. But this is your single biggest vulnerability right now. If B ever needs a reason to have you removed from that office, "she was doing unauthorized work on company time using company resources" is an extremely clean one. You handed them a weapon and they don't even know they have it yet. Stop doing their work during office hours. Today. Not gradually — today. 🚨
You've been waiting for gratitude to regulate their behavior. Here's something worth knowing about people who exploit closeness: they don't run on gratitude. They run on incentives. A doesn't call you because she values you — she calls you because calling you gets her free work. The gratitude framework doesn't work on incentive-based people. Rules work. Prices work. Written scope works. The moment you introduce those, the calculation changes. 💰
You expected them to honor verbal promises. The job promise was verbal. The meal promise was verbal. The "just help us through this period" was verbal. Verbal promises from people who benefit from keeping them vague are not promises. They're placeholders used to keep you compliant while the situation develops in their favor. This is not cynicism — this is the pattern you've now documented across two months. Believe the pattern. 📊
Here's the core principle: you don't need to blow anything up. You just need to introduce structure where there was none — because structure is what people who exploit informal arrangements hate most. Chaos is their natural habitat. Documentation and defined scope is yours, starting now. 📋
Do not announce this emotionally. Do not explain your feelings. Just respond to the next request with this:
"My office workload is very heavy lately, so I can't take additional tasks the way I used to. If you want me to help, we need to clarify the scope and compensation first so I can schedule properly."
That sentence ends the free era. It doesn't accuse anyone. It doesn't reference the broken promises or the two months of unpaid work. It just introduces, for the first time, the concept that your time has conditions. 📌
Also on Day 1: stop doing their work during office hours entirely. If you need to finish something already in progress, finish it on your own time — but nothing new touches office time. Remove the weapon before it gets used against you. 🔒
Make a simple table. Task name, delivery date, number of revisions, estimated hours, software cost you absorbed. This is not pettiness. This is a professional record of services rendered, and you're going to need it for the next step. Be conservative in your estimates — you want this to be defensible, not dramatic. 🗂️
B is the thread connected to your office risk, which makes B the conversation that matters most. Not A — A has already shown you who she is across two months of behavior. B is the one with structural power over your situation.
"B, I'd like to clarify the work I've been supporting for the shop over the past two months. I've delivered [brief list: signs, menus, templates, page setup, invoicing systems]. It's starting to affect my primary job, and there are also software costs and real working hours involved on my side. If you want me to continue supporting the business, I'd like to confirm whether this is a freelance arrangement, part-time role, or page admin position — and what the compensation and scope would be. If that's not possible to define right now, I'll need to stop taking additional work so I don't put my primary job at risk."
This frames the conversation as an operational clarification, not a complaint. You're not saying they wronged you. You're saying the current arrangement is unsustainable and you need it defined. That's professional language, and it's much harder to dismiss or retaliate against than "I feel used." 🎯
For page admin specifically — since that's the current ask — you need a number and a scope before you do a single post. The monthly retainer model works best for this type of ongoing work:
Price it at the number where you won't resent doing it. Not the number you think they'll accept — the number where, if they say yes, you're genuinely okay with the arrangement. There's a strong psychological case for pricing slightly higher than your floor, because people who get a "discount" feel like they won something, and people who think they won something are easier to work with. 💰
A chat message confirming scope, deliverables, pay, revision limit, and payment timing is a functional agreement. It doesn't need to be a contract. It needs to exist in writing so "that's not what we agreed" has a factual answer. 📄
When they ask for something new:
"My office workload has gotten heavy, so I can't take extra tasks casually anymore. If you want my help, let's confirm scope and compensation first so I can plan properly."
When they laugh at "how much will you pay":
"I understand. If hiring isn't possible, I can't take it on — I need to focus on my primary job. No hard feelings."
Then stop. Do not elaborate. Do not soften it. Do not offer a compromise unprompted. Let the silence sit. 🤫
When they try to assign something verbally:
"Before I start, can you confirm the scope, deadline, and pay here in chat? I've learned I need everything in writing so we're aligned and avoid revision loops."
For back pay — if you want to try for it:
"I've put together a summary of the work I delivered over the past two months — [list]. It comes to approximately [X] hours plus [software cost]. I'd like to request retroactive compensation of [amount] to make the arrangement fair. Going forward I can only take work under paid terms with defined scope."
If back pay isn't possible — convert to credit:
"If retroactive pay isn't workable right now, I'd ask that the past work be treated as credit against future paid work. For page admin, I can start at [amount] per month, paid before the month begins."
You're afraid that if you stop being useful to A and B, B will use his position as a partner to have you pushed out of the office. That fear is legitimate — I won't tell you it's irrational. But let's look at what actually protects you here.
The most dangerous thing in your current situation is not your relationship with A and B. It's the fact that you've been doing their work during office hours. That's the real vulnerability. If B wanted to build a case against you, that's the material. Which is why removing it — now, today — is more important than any conversation about money or scope. Take away the weapon before the weapon gets used. 🔒
Second: frame every interaction going forward as operational, not personal. "I need scope and pay confirmed" is a professional request. It's very difficult to fire someone for making professional requests — especially in writing, where the request is documented. The moment you shift from "I feel taken advantage of" to "I need the work terms defined," you move from emotional territory (where you're vulnerable) to professional territory (where you have standing). 📋
Third: quietly start building your exit. Not because you're quitting today — because people with options negotiate differently from people who are trapped. Update your portfolio with the work you've done. The menus, the signs, the design work, the Excel systems — that's a real body of work, and it belongs to your portfolio even if it was unpaid. Start sending out three to five applications per week. Keep it quiet. sammā-sankappa — right intention toward your own future — includes not leaving your livelihood entirely in the hands of people who have already broken their promises to you once. 🪷
In the Buddhist concept of anicca — impermanence — the current arrangement will not last forever regardless of what you do. The question is whether you shape how it ends, or whether you wait for it to end on their terms. Shape it. 📌
The final DramoCiety truth: She called your skills worth a meal — a meal she then didn't buy. That's not a friend who got a bit greedy. That's a person who looked at your work and decided it had no value, because you hadn't told her it did. You know its value. Start charging accordingly. 🔥
If workplace stress and financial pressure are affecting your mental health:
🇺🇸 US: Crisis Text Line — Text HOME to 741741 | SAMHSA Helpline: 1-800-662-4357
🇬🇧 UK: Samaritans — 116 123 (free, 24/7)
🇨🇦 Canada: Crisis Services Canada — 1-833-456-4566
🇦🇺 Australia: Lifeline — 13 11 14
All content on DramoCiety is for reflective and educational purposes only. If you're navigating significant workplace or financial distress, consider speaking with a licensed professional or employment counselor.
0 Comments