Love-Drama

When she makes mistakes, she “never” makes mistakes—he protects her to the extreme. Even when she answers test questions wrong, he still gives her full marks, and he always has an excuse to support it. Nobody dares to argue. Wrong becomes right every time.
Today in the evening, before going home, I walked to the boss’s office, knocked, and asked if there was any work left. I saw her standing there as if she was asking about work, but she was pressing her chest against his arm. When she saw me, she backed away a bit, but her eyes were absolutely murderous.
Also, among my subordinates, there are people who “support” this situation—basically offering her up to the boss so they can be favored too, so they won’t be the unwanted leftovers. Some of them even know the boss’s wife. They’ve seen her photos and have traveled together. I don’t personally know his wife.
One evening you knock on the boss’s door like a professional:
“Is there anything pending before I go home?”
And what you see is…your female subordinate standing way closer than necessary, acting way more intimate than work requires.
And the look she gives you isn’t a junior who’s nervous around her supervisor. It’s the look of:
“Don’t touch what’s mine.”
And the person who should be the adult in that room doesn’t make it professional—not even a little. If anything, he makes it clear you have no right to “touch” this employee.
You’re not trying to meddle in anyone’s romance.
You’re trying to keep the workplace a workplace.
You’re trying to manage people with structure.
You’re trying to train staff so work doesn’t collapse.
You’re trying to make “mistakes” mean something so quality improves.
But right now, that employee has armor called “the boss.”
And the boss is the one with the authority.
He has a wife.
She has a boyfriend.
Some coworkers are even cheering the “pairing” because they want to be loved too.
So this is no longer just “two people.” It’s becoming a culture—and it’s dragging everyone else into the mess.
So we have to talk strategy, not just venting.
But before strategy, I’m going to warn you about one common weakness hardworking, decent people often have in cases like this:
They believe “being right” will win by itself.
They try to control the game with fairness and logic.
But when power is cheating the rules, fairness alone is not enough.
You need strategy, documentation, boundaries.
Alright. Step by step.
People hear “the boss is sleeping with a subordinate” and focus on morality.
But in workplaces, solutions rarely win through morality. They win through workplace impact and risk.
In organizational language, this is:
Unfair decision-making + quality risk + ethics/reputation risk + toxic work climate + power retaliation.
That’s the language that makes senior leadership move—if your organization still has a brain.
Key point:
Do not lead with the word “affair.”
Lead with impact, unfairness, risk.
Because “affair” drags you into the battlefield of “gossip / defamation / personal life.”
You want the battlefield of process and governance.
This game must be played quiet, sharp, documented, bounded.
Now I’ll give you a concrete plan you can actually execute.
Start today. Keep it private.
Example of a safe, professional entry:
“Jan __, 17:20 — Employee A was in the boss’s office to ‘ask about work’ (no handover document observed). The next working day, the boss reprimanded me regarding training Employee A without specifying concrete points and instructed me not to manage Employee A.”
Why this matters:
If things blow up later, you’ll have a timeline + pattern that shows systemic favoritism, not “your emotions.”
Your current pain: you assign/train, she twists it, you get blamed.
Fix: after every verbal instruction or training moment, send a short written recap (LINE/email).
Examples:
“Summary: Today Employee A will complete 1) __ 2) __ and submit by __. If anything is unclear, please ask.”
Or:
“Today I explained the procedure for __. If you encounter issues when doing it, please send the file/screenshot so I can review.”
This isn’t being picky. It’s removing her ability to rewrite the story.
When she makes mistakes, speak in system language:
“The error is __. The impact is __. The fix is __. Please revise and resubmit by __.”
You’re not judging her as a person. You’re managing deliverables.
Do not argue like you’re defending yourself. Ask for clarity like you’re aligning to standards.
“Understood. So I can work exactly as you expect, could you please specify:
“Understood. To avoid confusion, may I confirm that from now on Employee A will report directly to you (or another manager), and tasks for Employee A should be assigned through that channel?”
This is a strategic move: if he blocks you from managing her, he must own the consequences.
Use this phrase often:
“Sure—could you please confirm the assignment in LINE/email so I can prioritize and be accountable correctly?”
People who thrive on chaos hate written traces. Good.
If your organization has multiple bosses, use that.
“Task X is pending because it requires input from the assigned owner (Employee A). If completion is required by __, please assign a backup owner or authorize access to __.”
You are not accusing anyone. You are making the system visible.
Report this as conflict of interest and favoritism impacting work quality, not as “he’s cheating.”
If whistleblower protection is weak, start as a “policy consultation,” not a direct accusation:
“I’d like guidance on how to handle a situation where perceived favoritism/conflict of interest between a supervisor and subordinate is disrupting management and work quality.”
A competent HR will connect the dots.
“I’d like to request an adjustment to the reporting structure. In practice, I’m unable to supervise Employee A effectively because training and normal management repeatedly lead to conflict and reprimands without clear standards. To keep workflow stable and reduce conflict, I request that Employee A report directly to __ (manager) instead.”
This keeps you out of the blast radius while sounding professional.
Straight answer: No—not right now.
It becomes personal-family warfare, you’ll be labeled the spark, and you don’t have proof strong enough to survive the fallout.
Your battlefield is the workplace system: fairness, process, risk.
“This deliverable contains an error in __. I informed Employee A at __ (attached message). If we proceed without correction, the risk is __. Please advise how you’d like to proceed.”
This creates a paper trail that you did your job.
You don’t win by “being right.” You win by:
And one final story-beat, because I know how it feels:
One night you’ll look in the mirror and realize you’re not tired only from work.
You’re tired from swallowing unfairness every day.
You don’t need to win the morality contest.
You need to win the professional survival game—and refuse to be the scapegoat.
ð
workplace favoritism, boss-subordinate affair, conflict of interest, power imbalance, executive retaliation, toxic office politics, unfair performance evaluation, biased training opportunities, scapegoating at work, managing a protected employee, documentation strategy, incident log, written task assignment, email/LINE recap, boundary setting at work, reporting line change, HR ethics complaint, whistleblower risk, professional risk language, workplace governance, compliance and reputation risk, managing without quitting, workplace survival plan
All entries on DramoCiety are for reflective and educational purposes only. They are not personal or therapeutic advice.
0 Comments